@sir What alternatives could you suggest? IRC is text-only and primitive and Matrix is slow and I haven't yet seen a client with decent UX. I haven't used Zulip or Mattermost yet, I've only heard of them.


@phoe IRC is king, text-only is a feature not a bug

@sir @slp Of course it's a feature - unless you want to chat with someone who isn't a complete and total developer nerd like me or you and wants standard contemporary features like automatic image uploads, conversation threads, channel history, or if you want to build a community of non-technological people around your software. At that point, I observed that people prefer to leave rather than stay on IRC.

Or they start Discord servers of their own.


I'm sympathetic to those concerns.

With IRC trollspamming finally endemic on many FOSS-associated networks & subsequent need for nick registration, the very low barrier-to-entry of IRC which was a trade-off against more intricate feature sets is gone.

@sir @slp

@deejoe @phoe @slp right, let me know when Slack stops making your register too


you know, you really don't have to get in my face with that shit

i don't fucking use slack

@phoe @slp

@deejoe @phoe @slp well slack is what we're fucking talking about pal


so, you're here to promote slack, then?

if not, then maybe we're also talking about something else too

@phoe @slp


That said, there are many choices which provide more features, but retain IRC's end-to-end freedom.

@sir @slp

@deejoe @phoe @slp more features are the opposite of what we need


yes, I've seen how you cherish such an expansive & welcoming "we"

@phoe @slp

@deejoe @phoe @slp who pissed in your coffee & asprin mug this morning


I don't know, but, see, it's afternoon here, and there's this guy in the timeline being all shouty, who then gets all knee jerk & sarcastic even with folks who support some his points.

But nah, that couldn't be it, could it?

@phoe @slp

@phoe @sir @slp

whichever is used by a project, my take is that it should be bridged to IRC at the very least.

@deejoe @phoe @sir @slp I wrote an IRC bridge for Potato. Sadly, not enough people were interested in a free Slack alternative to make that project viable.

It's a pity, since it worked perfectly fine, was self-hosted and had features that Slack still lacks (for example, the ability to implement bots that push custom HTML in replies).

@phoe @sir The original toot was talking about FOSS projects, so I'm assuming most people involved have a technical background.

Also, with the proper tools, IRC isn't hard to use at all.

@slp @sir Yep - my case is perhaps a little bit more specific. I want a means of collaborating with people who are both deeply technical and deeply non-technical, and also includes most (or at least some) of the features I have listed above. When it comes to programming, I'm eager to nerd all over Freenode, but when it comes to collaborating with non-technerds, I'm looking for something more featureful, or the community will go set up a Discord server anyway.

@phoe @slp I reject this idea that non-nerds *need* features. It makes no sense. More features is more difficult to comprehend.

@moderator @slp @phoe some IRC clients like The Longue support inline images etc

@sir @phoe @slp

yet: if everynerdy did that, nerds would be dead within a few decades entirely.

nobody's born a nerd. people don't learn in a vacuum. some people need people contact to learn, or pictures, or whatever.

if you're not volunteering to teach, that's understandable -- I refuse too -- but from someone with severe learning problems, I can tell you accessible isn't just cheap hardware

it's unicode, screenreaders, pictures, text-to-speech, and sometimes people contact

just saying ❤️

@sir @phoe @slp

(plus, technically speaking, that's a broader form of the 640k mistake, in a sense: "nobody 'needs' more than text!" well, okay, but 'nobody' disagrees pretty strongly and there's evidence suggesting that not all people can learn effectively and quickly from pure text, too. :\ )

@sydneyfalk @phoe @slp I disagree. 90% of modern nerds were raised on text. They somehow figured it out. You know computers had text-only interfaces *before* they had raster interfaces, right?

@sir @phoe @slp

I cut my teeth on Doom, son. ;) I'm aware. And I flailed desperately for years and years, mostly due to my learning defects and low tolerance for frustration.

This is also arguably an example of the "well X was just fine why would we Y"? We didn't go to the moon for years and years, said people during the space race -- why bother now? It's a waste of money, yeesh.

Nobody knows what lies beyond their space if they refuse to innovate past what they are already comfortable with.

@sydneyfalk @phoe @slp I'm not making a general argument here, just refuting your idea that nerds would die out if we used text-only interfaces. They wouldn't.

@sir @phoe @slp

If you're using lynx right now to toot things, I will literally accept that you literally believe this.

Especially if you don't have a smartphone (which was decried as 'dumbed down' computing by some, IIRC).

Otherwise, I'm going to assume you believe it in some sense, in a "well I had to so they have to" sense. And I'm gonna tell you, as someone who thought that way a long time: It doesn't move forward. It is stationary.

It is, long-term, quite unhelpful. (IMO, obviously.)

@sir @phoe @slp

And no, "Nerds" won't die. Your concept of them, though, could -- things that refuse to maintain or grow die, and fertilize the things that are willing to grow. The "old guard" of "real" techs, or whatever this concept is; yes, they'll function. But as a slim minority at best. It's endless meta-November forever, all the way down.

This is meant as food for thought, assuming people are looking for that.

Anyway: Be well. ^_^

@sir @phoe @slp

(oh, and I forgot: I don't think I actually said that they'd die? I was saying they'd be excluding people that might be interested, and if they're doing it out of "well fuck you" issues, then it's probably illogical and unnecessary. since logic is more important than feelings under all circumstance, it'd probably be logical if the old guard passed on their stuff, however they can, to people who can use it after they're in the ground.)

@sir @phoe @slp

(correction, upon rereading, I did say that. it was maybe 20% hyperbolic, but yes, I did technically say that. my mistake, and please, accept my apology for the error.)

@sydneyfalk @phoe @slp not to mention that IRC is by FAR the most accessible chat medium, if you're going to drop the text-to-speech into this discussion

@sir @phoe
Some people I have to work with don't understand this argument :/

@sir @phoe the lack of proper support for multiple logins does kind of kill it though, most people don't have the patience to set up bouncers

@sir @phoe IRC is king if your community is made of developers. And if you can deal with spam (if you're all devs, +r and the like helps).

If you have a FOSS project where most members of the community are not devs (or even tech savvy), IRC is sadly far from being king. First, end-users will not set up bouncers, and lack of history is an issue. Then comes spam (and +r isn't an option, since end-users ain't going to talk to NickServ). :|

Sign in to participate in the conversation

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!