Imagine an alternate reality where the only chat protocol that ever proliferated was IRC
Now how do we get to this reality...
@sir I guess because people nowadays are monstly not capable of using a computer. So irc as a protocol became too "hard" to use. Then companies came and hid all this nasty technical stuff in fancy guis, emojis and stuff.
This lead to people not caring about the underlying protocol as long as they were able to post funny gifs which lead to companies to implement proprietery protocols to wall the users in.
@sir I was asking myself yesterday why I prefer Telegram to IRC. The big things that put me (as a tech-savvy person who like federated things) off IRC are awkward sign-up and auth (/msg NickServ isn't a pleasant experience), and having to be always connected to get a scroll back of messages you missed, or notified if someone pings you.
If those things put me off, I bet there's a dozen others that stop it proliferating to the mass market.
I think Twitch uses IRC for the chat function and it works like a charm.
@sir tbh, IRC is not that good a protocol. The core of it is pretty good, definitely better than a random proprietary JSON-over-websocket stuff. Bu ton top of that core, a lot of nasty things grew.
Everybody has extensions on top of RFC1459. RFC2811 contains some of those extensions, but also a lot of supposedly-standard features that never got implemented.
Then there's ISUPPORT, and some other stuff like that.
And I'm not even touching on upper layers like services or CTCP.
Basically, IRC is not standardized at all.
It's like "do whatever everyone else does".
Even the IRCv3 group (whose extensions are IMO pretty nice and well documented) didn't bother to standardize what they're extensions are built on top. They cite 1459, but that alone is not enough to get a working implementation.
I think in the IRC-dominated universe you mentioned, the protocol must've evolved in a different way.
9 times out of 10, I can find a channel for exactly what I want to talk about and instantly get several people (usually experts) into a discussion (from health to software, informal chatting to gaming). Every other communication platform I've tried (besides email) seems shockingly barren in comparison, from XMPP to discord to slack.
If anything, the universe where IRC is the only chat app that has proliferated is the one we are in right now.
Teach me your ways, please! I *like* IRC, but 9 time out of 10, when I show up to an IRC channel, it seems dead/abandoned—even the ones with dozens of people signed in have few to zero responses to any given comment or question.
In contrast, even simple questions on here or a (decent) subreddit seem to get far more of a response, and frequently from people who seem pretty knowledgable. So what's the secret to getting more out of IRC
Maybe that's been my problem—I stick around for a bit, but certainly not for days. I tend to conclude that, once my question or comment is ~2 screens off the page, that it's not likely anyone will scroll back up that far to see it (and re-asking feels rude). So I tend to give up and wander off after an hour or so.
But I don't actually log out—maybe I should SSH into my WeeChat server and see if any of my questions got answered after I wandered off…
Sometimes, you just have to find the right channel (which may be on another network!). For example, my go-to channel for systems programming help happens to be a channel registered for a browser game. IRC lets you find that single person on earth who can unblock you the most effectively, whereas most other platforms will represent the "average person".
@sir Imagine an alternative reality where IRC managed to fix itself and *therefore* proliferated!
@sir Make IRC persistent, fix accounts to not send passwords in cleartext, have good apps instead of shitty monospace terminal emulators, make the UI for group settings not be bitmasks set by chat commands, make it safe to transfer files and have hosting for images, files, transcripts, have server-side notifications. Probably more. IRC is a primitive joke. #irc
@mdhughes most IRC servers already support SSL, so no need to do anything special for passwords there. I don't care to answer the rest of your complaints
@sir And this is why IRC will continue to be ignored.
@mdhughes yeah, I'll just go have a pity party about it with the 80,000 other people being productive and social on Freenode *right now*.
@sir OK, the hundreds of millions on more modern systems won't miss you all.
@mdhughes to be honest I guess one advantage of other chat systems is that they act like a magnet to keep morons like you off of IRC
@sir Yes, I can see the kind and welcoming culture of IRC is really going to draw them in. You're a credit to your species, whatever that is.
@mdhughes I wasn't the one who started slinging mud.
@sir I criticized an obsolete networking protocol with bad clients. Programs aren't people, IRC user.
@mdhughes follow up with more mud, good call
cmpwn.com is a private Mastodon instance for friends of SirCmpwn.